Friday, March 13, 2009

Kings

WORLD: Another of the more controversial elements of the show was the choice to make the Jack/Jonathan character gay. Can you talk a little bit about what led you to that decision and what you think it brings to the show?

GREEN: I don't think it is controversial. The goal of the show was to take the story of David and make it contemporary. So I wanted anything that exists in our world to exist in the world of Kings. And people of all sorts exist in our world, and they make for a good story.

WORLD: Fair enough, but how do you think the Christian community will respond to that interpretation of Jonathan?

GREEN: That depends on how you define Christian community. Most of them we have heard from so far have been extremely positive about it. But I know that there are some people who think that any representation of any gay character on any network or cable show is wrong. And anyone who thinks that a gay character is not welcome on television is perfectly welcome not to watch my show.


Above excerpt taken from a World Magazine article where they interviewed the producer of the upcoming NBC series called Kings.

As far as answering the question of making Jack/Jonathan gay by switching and saying "But I know that there are some people who think that nay reprersentation of any gay character on any network or cable show is wrong" ... is nothing but a dodge and an example of the fallacy of accident or universal generalization.

For those who are tempted to point out he stated "Most of them we have heard from so far have been extremely positive about it"; let me point out what the producer did not address was evidence to support the suggestion that the Bible sought to portray Jonathan as gay.

I wonder if by stating "I don't think it's controversial" the producer is as naive as he tries to come across or whether he's simply trying to tell us how to think.

28 comments:

  1. jazzy, you have a great way of breaking things down, only the last one should say "I and (entertainment establishment) do not care what God's Word intended or what Bible believing Christians think, in projecting a view of life we want to see adopted and embraced, we'll show it trusting that many will watch it anyway and overtime without using discernment will begin to accept the practice even if they don't adopt it themselves and eventually the practice will become normalized in American minds and society.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's things like this that makes people associate "Christianity" with "hate".

    Perhaps you should actually attempt to love other human beings, as opposed to judging and condemning them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I completely agree with Parker and Smo.
    If you don't agree with the TV show, then don't watch it. It's really that simple.

    ReplyDelete
  4. But the interview never said that in the Bible Jonathan is gay, simply that in updating the story to modern times, it was updated to include members of society we recognize today, including gay men. If you are going to complain about the show on the grounds that it reinterpreted a character in a modern way, you might as well complain about the fact they aren't all living in the same kind of houses and wearing the same kind of clothes that people did two thousand years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OK.

    I don't like the fact the characters aren't all living in the same kind of houses and wearing the same kind of clothes that people did two thousand years ago.

    This is NOT a Biblical story by any stretch of the imagination.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1. Smo, having asserted hate, how about defining what constitutes the hatred here. Disagreement and opposition to a position of morality does not constitute hatred, or else you've just done what you accused us of. :)

    2. medb555, while you're technically correct when you say "the interview never said that in the Bible Jonathan is gay", you can't be that naive as to think this decision has nothing to do with today's issues and setting forth a particular side.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Disagreement and opposition to a position of morality"

    So that's how you justify your hatred of gay people.

    Whatever lets you sleep at night.

    ReplyDelete
  8. That would require there actually be something defensible in the topic itself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. it would be useless to try to insert reason into your completely unreasonable belief system. you are ignorant. i cannot cure you of that. so there's no use arguing with you. you will never change your mind, you will continue to spread hate when a real christian made in God's image would spread love. so, what else is there to say? this is something you'll have to explain to God, not me. explain to Him why you twist His words into hate, it makes no difference to me.

    ReplyDelete
  10. parker stated: "it would be useless to try to insert reason into your completely unreasonable belief system....a real christian made in God's image would spread love..."

    Response: Doesn't this seem a little inconsistent to you? Which is it? "completely unreasonable", if so, then why do then base your latter argument upon it....

    Seems to me, you just want to argue. (It's the reason for this that I hope expose).

    ReplyDelete
  11. YOUR belief system is unreasonable, not ALL belief systems.

    Yes, only gays don't hate gays. I am a straight female.

    i could quote Leviticus to you until your eyes bled with all the other things God does not approve of, that you, surely, do not abide by...but i'm sure you would have a way to slime around it.

    and i haven't seen you explain why you think homosexuality is wrong, except it's something you read one time, right? you'd have to be pretty simple minded to base your life on someone that you read in a book once.

    and i already said i don't want to argue. this will be my last comment. have a nice, hateful life. hope hating others one day makes you feel some sort of contentment someday.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "YOUR belief system is unreasonable, not ALL belief systems."

    Response: Don't you think you should inquire as to my belief system before condemning it?

    "Yes, only gays don't hate gays. I am a straight female."

    Response: So, does this mean YOU hate gays?

    "i could quote Leviticus to you until your eyes bled with all the other things God does not approve of, that you, surely, do not abide by...but i'm sure you would have a way to slime around it."

    Response: One which (although consistent with hemeneutical principles and the reading of the text itself) you would not accept even if "biblical" reasons themselves were set before you.

    "and i haven't seen you explain why you think homosexuality is wrong, except it's something you read one time, right?"

    Response: Not the purpose of the post. :)

    "you'd have to be pretty simple minded to base your life on someone that you read in a book once."

    Response: Who says this is the case?

    "and i already said i don't want to argue. this will be my last comment."

    Response: Too bad, we could benefit through discourse, but that's hard for those who are afraid to submit their own thoughts and beliefs to examination and evaluation.

    "hope hating others one day makes you feel some sort of contentment someday."

    Response: I love righteousness so much I hate to see it opposed and then false statements made concerning it.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1. even more ad hominem.

    2. Besides the fact that that's not the case around the world, what's more important is not the opinion of man but the eternal law of God to which all men stand accountable. For this reason, all who violate the law are called to repent and turn from their rebellious and sinful ways.

    ReplyDelete
  14. There is certainly much hate being displayed in this thread by those who are intolerant and ignorant of Christian doctrine.....

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes, you poor Christians are so persecuted.

    http://i42.tinypic.com/2e1dche.gif

    ReplyDelete
  16. haha, I thought you were a troll with your "I don't like the fact the characters aren't all living in the same kind of houses and wearing the same kind of clothes that people did two thousand years ago." comment.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "1. Smo, having asserted hate, how about defining what constitutes the hatred here. Disagreement and opposition to a position of morality does not constitute hatred, or else you've just done what you accused us of. :)"

    I define the belief that gay people are wrong/disgusting/unacceptable/etc as hatred. I'm perfectly willing to accept & appreciate other people's morals and opinions, up until the point at which they are, if you will, hateful towards groups of people.

    ReplyDelete
  18. And just for reference, I do not oppose Christianity. I am Christian myself.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "I define the belief that gay people are wrong/disgusting/unacceptable/etc as hatred".

    Rather an arbitrary definition don't you think?

    "And just for reference, I do not oppose Christianity. I am Christian myself."

    If you are a Christian, why do you oppose God's laws concerning homosexuality?

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'm guessing you don't think women should have the right to vote either.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'm guessing you also don't shave, don't wear mixed fabrics, and don't go near women while they're on their periods either. Because that's all in the Bible as well.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Because I do not consider that to be one of God's Laws. Please do not pretend that you can only be a Christian if you follow each and every one of "God's Laws" to the letter. If that's your definition of a Christian, then I assume you refuse to each shellfish, would never mix fabrics for fear of condemnation, and would be perfectly happy to stone adulterers to death.

    And no, I do not think my definition was arbitrary.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I CERTAINLY DON'T have to guess whether the previous individuals distinguish between the O.T. laws particular to the theocracy of Israel and the moral law which is universal and applies to all, for their posts reveals they haven't!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Sounds like you have a problem with God, and therefore want to make your own laws. Psalm 2 has a good description of those who want to cast the Lord's cords from them.

    I don't concern myself with ceremonial laws that have their fulfillment in Christ (1 Timothy 4:3), but a born again Christian does "walk in my statutes and be careful to obey my rules." (Ezekiel 36:27).

    Those who practice homosexuality shall not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9-10). Honor Paul's warning "Do not be deceived".

    ReplyDelete
  25. Haha, okay. I don't really have an interest in arguing with fundamentalists, sorry. I try to live my life following the simplest rules from the Bible (turn the other cheek, love your neighbour) as opposed to condemning, judging and casting out. Just for the record, claiming I have a problem with God simply because I interpret the Bible a little different from you is pretty transparent.

    Honestly, I think the best way to live your life is to love & accept everyone as best you can, without judgment. God is the only one who can and should cast final judgment.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Smo,
    Your statements and position are no different than others who try to sound pious and "better than thou" according to your OWN standard, but fail to recognize, observe, and keep GOD'S standard when you fail to distinguish between "judging" others and the Christian's responsibility to make right "judgments" in all things. Does not the Scripture state "The spiritual man makes judgments about all things ..." (1 Cor 2:15) In effect, by simply "picking and choosing" which of God's statutes you are willing to follow, you are not submitting to God but serving yourself, your own desires, and determining the law that you follow.

    In addition, while claiming to follow the simplist rules of the Bible such as love your neighbor, you fail to discern that one love must be defined. For example, is love allowing others to participate in homosexuality just because they want to without making them aware of God's will OR is it to seek to persuade them with their interest in mind to turn from their sinful ways and to walk in the ways of the Lord? Too often, people who claim to live according to the "simple" truths state this as in order to avoid scrutiny of their views as well as to continue in their practices as if to evade the greater truths. The light of truth however, exposes this as well, and proves it's weaknesses.

    ReplyDelete
  27. You, too, are a pick-and-choose Christian. Unless you follow all those laws both Sarah Milan and I pointed out earlier.

    Homosexuality is hardly "the major portion" of the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Abandon the debate - interesting debate strategy - probably a good one when your premise is exposed as invalid...good job, sword! :)

    ReplyDelete