Skip to main content

Death or Robots: God's Redemptive Strategy in a Broken World

Death or Robots: God's Redemptive Strategy

Why God Didn't Destroy Humanity or Override Free Will—and How He Chose the Harder, Holier Path of Societal Sanctification

When people read the Old Testament and encounter practices like slavery, polygamy, or patriarchy, the immediate reaction is often moral outrage. "Why didn't God abolish these things right away?" But the real question isn't why God allowed cultural sin.

The real question is: Why didn't He destroy humanity outright?

When Israel worshiped the golden calf at Sinai, God was ready to wipe them out and start over. When the earth was filled with violence in Noah's day, He did exactly that—judgment by flood. Total reset.

God could have chosen death—swift, righteous destruction.

He also could've chosen robots—override human will, program morality into hearts like software, eliminate rebellion by design.

But He chose neither.

Instead, God chose the harder road: accommodation.
He chose to work within broken cultures to gradually sanctify them, embedding truth in time, preserving freedom while moving history toward Christ.

It's slower. Messier. But it honors both the justice of God and the image of God in man.


The Divine Dilemma: Judgment, Override, or Redemption?

God's options were stark:

  • Destroy a sinful people? He'd done it before.
  • Rewire their will? That would violate love itself.

But the third option—patient redemption—meant enduring sin for a season in order to defeat it forever. God's accommodation isn't moral compromise; it's divine condescension for the sake of transformation. He didn't sanctify cultures by bypassing human agency. He did it through covenant, law, incarnation, and grace.

And that redemptive arc reaches from Genesis to Jesus—and beyond.

Divine Accommodation as Redemptive Strategy

Jesus makes this principle explicit in Matthew 19:8:

"Because of your hardness of heart, Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so."

God permitted certain practices—not because they were ideal, but because people weren't yet capable of the ideal. Just like sanctification in a believer's life doesn't happen overnight, cultural sanctification unfolds across generations.

Divine accommodation isn't an endorsement of sin. It's the strategy God uses instead of judgment or override. It's what made redemption possible without destroying the very people He came to save.

Slavery: Regulated, Constrained, Undone

Slavery in the Hebrew Bible was not ideal—but it was constrained within redemptive boundaries:

  • Slaves released every seven years
  • Physical abuse punishable by law
  • Foreign slaves granted asylum
  • Families reunited

Compared to the surrounding world, this was morally revolutionary. But even more: it was temporary. A holding pattern. A path toward abolition through spiritual reformation, not civil war.

These laws weren't meant to last forever. They were footholds toward freedom—principles to be fulfilled in Christ.

The Christocentric Fulfillment of Cultural Sanctification

Jesus didn't lead a slave revolt. He did something more radical: He preached a kingdom where slavery couldn't survive.

"The Spirit of the Lord is upon me… to set the oppressed free." — Luke 4:18

"You shall love your neighbor as yourself." — Matthew 22:39

"There is neither slave nor free… for you are all one in Christ Jesus." — Galatians 3:28

Jesus fulfilled the arc that began with Moses. What the law regulated, He rendered obsolete. Love made slavery theologically impossible.

Societal Sanctification: The Long Redemption

Just as sanctification in a believer is slow and often painful, cultural sanctification unfolds over centuries. God met patriarchs and tribes where they were—not to leave them there, but to lead them toward justice, dignity, and truth.

The Old Testament doesn't celebrate polygamy, kings, divorce, or slavery. It shows God tolerating fallen systems while planting time bombs inside them:

  • "Love your neighbor"
  • "Do justice, love mercy"
  • "In humility count others more significant than yourselves"

These ideas destabilized ancient hierarchies. And when Jesus came, they exploded into a community of radical equality.

And Here's the Kicker

Sanctification is progress without perfection. But it doesn't stop there.

Just as believers will one day be glorified, so too will cultures. God isn't just redeeming souls. He's redeeming civilizations. The law restrained. Grace transforms. But glory finishes the job.

"Behold, I am making all things new." — Revelation 21:5

Not just hearts. Everything. Societies. Systems. Structures.

Slavery was a stage. Love is the way. Glory is the destination.

The Gospel Makes Injustice Impossible

The law restrained evil. Grace disarms it. Glory will destroy it.

When Christ reigns fully, no one will own another. No one will exploit another. Why? Because love—true, divine love—makes injustice impossible.

That's the genius of God's third way. Not death. Not robots. Redemption.

The Final Arc: From Accommodation to Glorification

We do not have to choose between defending slavery or abandoning Scripture. We have a third option—seeing slavery as a symptom God restrained, dismantled, and ultimately eliminated through Christ.

What we see in the Old Testament isn't moral confusion. It's redemptive restraint—God refusing to destroy or override, but instead choosing to patiently transform.

And what began in regulation ends in resurrection.

Conclusion: Love Resolves the Dilemma

Jesus reduced all the complexity to two commands:

"Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind.
Love your neighbor as yourself." — Matthew 22:37–39

Under that love, slavery dies. Oppression breaks. Cultures rise from ashes.

The divine accommodation wasn't God compromising. It was God delaying judgment to make room for mercy. Because He wasn't interested in death or programming. He wanted real transformation.

And He got it.


Apologetics in Action — Strategic Responses to Slavery Objections

The framework of divine accommodation and societal sanctification isn't just theologically sound—it's practically powerful. It gives us a coherent way to defend Scripture's integrity without dodging hard questions.

1. Start with Their Values, Not Your Framework

Don't lead with: "Well, divine accommodation explains…"
Do lead with: "What would you have wanted God to do? Instantly abolish slavery in cultures that would've collapsed? Or gradually transform hearts and institutions from within?"

2. Use the Double Bind Strategically

Skeptic: "If God is good, why allow slavery?"
You: "That's interesting—because usually when God does intervene directly, like with Canaan or the Flood, people call Him harsh. So which do you want: no intervention or strong intervention?"

3. Appeal to Their Progressive Values

You: "The abolitionists weren't rebelling against Scripture. They were fulfilling it. Wilberforce, Quakers, Tubman—'love your neighbor' made slavery impossible."

4. Use Modern Analogies

You: "Think about systemic racism. Do reformers demand overnight change? No—they work through law, culture, education. That's what God was doing in ancient Israel."

5. Flip the Burden of Proof

You: "If you were God, how would you have ended slavery in tribal societies without collapse? You get real people, not theoretical utopians."

6. Focus on Outcomes Over Origins

You: "What other ancient religious text birthed universal human rights? The biblical trajectory—especially through Christ—is unique."

7. Use the 'Time Bomb' Language

You: "God planted time bombs—'love your neighbor,' 'do justice'—that exploded oppressive systems once hearts were ready."

8. End with Jesus' Simplicity

You: "Jesus reduced it all to love God and neighbor. Under that kind of love, slavery doesn't survive. That's the whole point."

What NOT to Do

  • Don't minimize evil: "Slavery back then wasn't so bad…"
  • Don't defend every legal detail
  • Don't lecture—ask questions
  • Don't be smug—respect the weight of the topic

Advanced-Level Responses

Moral Realism Challenge:
"Your critique assumes moral truth. But on naturalism, where does that come from? You're borrowing moral capital from theism to critique theism."

Historical Hypocrisy Callout:
"Show me another ancient legal code that punished slave abuse, mandated release, and contained abolitionist principles. The Bible leads that list."

Final Frame

You're not defending slavery.
You're defending a trajectory:

  • From death avoided
  • To autonomy preserved
  • To holiness pursued
  • To glory secured

God didn't choose death. He didn't choose robots.
He chose redemption.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...

A Novel Reinterpretation of Origins: Literal Programmatic Incursion

Literal Programmatic Incursion: A Systems Approach to Biblical Creation Literal Programmatic Incursion A Systems Approach to Biblical Creation "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made." - John 1:1,3 A Note on Purpose and Approach The Challenge We Face In our modern era, believers committed to biblical authority often find themselves caught between two unsatisfying extremes: either dismissing scientific discoveries as irrelevant to faith, or compromising clear biblical teachings to accommodate prevailing scientific consensus. Neither path honors both God's revelation in Scripture and His revelation through the natural world. What This Framework Attempts The Literal Programmatic Incursion (LPI) framework represents an honest attempt to address this tension...

Search This Blog