Skip to main content

The Gospel of “Just”: Naturalism’s Shrinking Vocabulary and Growing Debt

There’s a gospel naturalism preaches, and it goes like this: “It’s just.”  

It’s just matter. Just energy. Just chance. Just neurons. Just evolution. Just language. Just logic. Just morality. Just you.  

But behind that tiny word—“just”—is a collapsing empire of miracles they refuse to name.


First, nothing explodes into everything—for no reason, from no cause. 


Miracle number one.  


Then, physical laws appear—fine-tuned to one part in 10^120. Gravity, electromagnetism, nuclear forces—all precisely balanced for life. 


Miracle number two.  


Then lifeless matter spontaneously organizes into coded, self-replicating, symbolically meaningful systems. DNA isn’t just molecules—it’s syntax, semantics, and execution. 


That’s miracle three.  


From there, blind evolution supposedly generates integrated biological systems with irreducible complexity and layered regulation. 


Miracle number four.  


Next, consciousness emerges—not just computation, but qualia, will, awareness. 


Miracle number five.  


Then logic and reason arise—immaterial, invariant, universally binding—from brains that evolved for survival, not truth. 


Miracle number six.


And at every step, when they hit the wall of explanation, they wave the wand and say the word: *emergence*.  


Consciousness? “It emerges.”  

Language? “It emerges.”  

Morality? “It emerges.”  

Symbolic logic in DNA? “Emergent properties.”  

Observer-triggered wavefunction collapse in QM? “Emergent from decoherence.”  


But “emergence” doesn’t mean anything if you can’t show the mechanism. It’s a label for magic in a worldview that forbids miracles. It’s saying, “This impossibly complex thing... just kind of showed up when enough stuff was around.” That’s not a theory. That’s a shrug in a lab coat.


And nowhere does this sleight of hand show more than in quantum mechanics.


In QM, particles don’t have defined properties until they’re observed. Probabilities rule. Measurement creates outcomes. Entangled particles communicate instantly across space. The system doesn’t “just behave”—it behaves *as if an observer matters.* And that wrecks the whole materialist model.


So they add layers: many worlds, hidden variables, decoherence theory—all trying to stuff the soul back in the machine. But the machine won’t cooperate.


Why? Because the universe doesn’t behave like a dead mechanism. It behaves like it’s being computed. Governed. Constrained by logic, drenched in information, awake to observation.


Naturalism can’t make sense of that. So it reduces, flattens, and spins.


You are not mind. You are meat.  

Morality is not obligation. It’s survival behavior.  

Consciousness isn’t special. It’s a trick.  

QM isn’t metaphysical. It’s misunderstood.  

Logic isn’t prescriptive. It’s adaptive.  


And when none of that works? “It just emerges.”


This is what happens when you try to explain a universe full of meaning, order, and mind without any foundation for meaning, order, or mind.


But Christians don’t need a magic word. We have a rational, personal, eternal source—*the Logos*.  


Not blind chance. Not spooky emergence. Not a roll of the quantum dice.  


A mind that speaks. A Word that upholds. A truth that explains everything else.


So the next time someone says, “It’s just…”—ask:  

What miracle did they just rename?  

What mystery did they just shrink with a buzzword?  

What rational leap are they asking you to make—without a rational foundation?


Then offer them a better way.  


The Gospel not of “just,” but of Jesus.  


The only Word that doesn’t collapse under the weight of meaning.


www.oddXian.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Logic or Luck? Why the Universe Reveals a Rational Creator, Not Blind Chance

The Two Competing Stories There are only two coherent explanations for the universe. Either: Everything came from nothing—guided by no mind, shaped by no purpose, and constrained by nothing but chance and time, Or everything was created by an eternal, rational Mind—who designed it, constrained it, and directs it according to a coherent plan. One story asks you to believe in accidents that somehow produce order, intelligence, and morality. The other begins with Reason Himself—and explains everything else from there. Logic: The Supernatural Key Let’s follow the evidence—starting with the one thing no worldview can escape: logic. No event in the universe ever violates fundamental logic. No contradiction ever holds. Even quantum particles, with all their unpredictability, behave within mathematically coherent frameworks. So we begin with this syllogism: Premise 1: No manifestation of nature violates fundamental logic. Premise 2: Fundamental logic transcends nature and const...

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...

Search This Blog