Skip to main content

The Gospel of “Just”: Naturalism’s Shrinking Vocabulary and Growing Debt

There’s a gospel naturalism preaches, and it goes like this: “It’s just.”  

It’s just matter. Just energy. Just chance. Just neurons. Just evolution. Just language. Just logic. Just morality. Just you.  

But behind that tiny word—“just”—is a collapsing empire of miracles they refuse to name.


First, nothing explodes into everything—for no reason, from no cause. 


Miracle number one.  


Then, physical laws appear—fine-tuned to one part in 10^120. Gravity, electromagnetism, nuclear forces—all precisely balanced for life. 


Miracle number two.  


Then lifeless matter spontaneously organizes into coded, self-replicating, symbolically meaningful systems. DNA isn’t just molecules—it’s syntax, semantics, and execution. 


That’s miracle three.  


From there, blind evolution supposedly generates integrated biological systems with irreducible complexity and layered regulation. 


Miracle number four.  


Next, consciousness emerges—not just computation, but qualia, will, awareness. 


Miracle number five.  


Then logic and reason arise—immaterial, invariant, universally binding—from brains that evolved for survival, not truth. 


Miracle number six.


And at every step, when they hit the wall of explanation, they wave the wand and say the word: *emergence*.  


Consciousness? “It emerges.”  

Language? “It emerges.”  

Morality? “It emerges.”  

Symbolic logic in DNA? “Emergent properties.”  

Observer-triggered wavefunction collapse in QM? “Emergent from decoherence.”  


But “emergence” doesn’t mean anything if you can’t show the mechanism. It’s a label for magic in a worldview that forbids miracles. It’s saying, “This impossibly complex thing... just kind of showed up when enough stuff was around.” That’s not a theory. That’s a shrug in a lab coat.


And nowhere does this sleight of hand show more than in quantum mechanics.


In QM, particles don’t have defined properties until they’re observed. Probabilities rule. Measurement creates outcomes. Entangled particles communicate instantly across space. The system doesn’t “just behave”—it behaves *as if an observer matters.* And that wrecks the whole materialist model.


So they add layers: many worlds, hidden variables, decoherence theory—all trying to stuff the soul back in the machine. But the machine won’t cooperate.


Why? Because the universe doesn’t behave like a dead mechanism. It behaves like it’s being computed. Governed. Constrained by logic, drenched in information, awake to observation.


Naturalism can’t make sense of that. So it reduces, flattens, and spins.


You are not mind. You are meat.  

Morality is not obligation. It’s survival behavior.  

Consciousness isn’t special. It’s a trick.  

QM isn’t metaphysical. It’s misunderstood.  

Logic isn’t prescriptive. It’s adaptive.  


And when none of that works? “It just emerges.”


This is what happens when you try to explain a universe full of meaning, order, and mind without any foundation for meaning, order, or mind.


But Christians don’t need a magic word. We have a rational, personal, eternal source—*the Logos*.  


Not blind chance. Not spooky emergence. Not a roll of the quantum dice.  


A mind that speaks. A Word that upholds. A truth that explains everything else.


So the next time someone says, “It’s just…”—ask:  

What miracle did they just rename?  

What mystery did they just shrink with a buzzword?  

What rational leap are they asking you to make—without a rational foundation?


Then offer them a better way.  


The Gospel not of “just,” but of Jesus.  


The only Word that doesn’t collapse under the weight of meaning.


www.oddXian.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...

A Novel Reinterpretation of Origins: Literal Programmatic Incursion

Literal Programmatic Incursion: A Systems Approach to Biblical Creation Literal Programmatic Incursion A Systems Approach to Biblical Creation "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made." - John 1:1,3 A Note on Purpose and Approach The Challenge We Face In our modern era, believers committed to biblical authority often find themselves caught between two unsatisfying extremes: either dismissing scientific discoveries as irrelevant to faith, or compromising clear biblical teachings to accommodate prevailing scientific consensus. Neither path honors both God's revelation in Scripture and His revelation through the natural world. What This Framework Attempts The Literal Programmatic Incursion (LPI) framework represents an honest attempt to address this tension...

Search This Blog