Skip to main content

Sin as Treason: Rethinking Loyalty, Rebellion, and Divine Authority

In Christian theology, sin is often seen as moral failure—“missing the mark” (Greek: hamartia). Yet, a closer look at Scripture reveals a deeper meaning: sin is treason against God’s rightful authority.



Loyalty as the True Mark


If the true “mark” is loyalty to God, sin becomes not just disobedience but betrayal of allegiance. Scripture emphasizes loyalty over ritual. The Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4-5) commands wholehearted devotion to God, and Jesus affirms this in Matthew 22:37-38.


Ancient Hebrew Terms for Treason


Several Hebrew words align sin with treason:

- Maʿal — Breach of faith (Leviticus 26:40)

- Bagad — Betrayal (Isaiah 24:16)

- Pashaʿ — Rebellion (1 Kings 12:19)


These terms reflect sin as rebellion against divine authority.


Cosmic Treason


The Fall of Adam and Eve was not mere failure but conscious rebellion. Humanity’s tendency toward sin reflects our free will as God’s image-bearers (Imago Dei), choosing autonomy over allegiance.


Loyalty vs. Slavish Submission


God desires loyalty, not forced submission. Hosea 6:6 and Galatians 5:1 show that God seeks loving allegiance, not mechanical obedience. True submission arises from love, not fear.


Original Sin Reconsidered


Reframing sin as treason, rather than inherited guilt, clarifies personal responsibility. Adam models humanity’s tendency toward rebellion, but each person bears responsibility for their own disloyalty.


Conclusion: Restoring Allegiance


Understanding sin as treason elevates the gravity of rebellion and deepens the meaning of grace. Redemption restores rightful allegiance to God’s kingship. Faithfulness is not slavish submission but loyal love—returning humanity to its purpose: glorifying God as free-willed, loyal image-bearers of His authority.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...
73 comments
Read more

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...
71 comments
Read more

A Novel Reinterpretation of Origins: Literal Programmatic Incursion

Literal Programmatic Incursion: A Systems Approach to Biblical Creation Literal Programmatic Incursion A Systems Approach to Biblical Creation "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made." - John 1:1,3 A Note on Purpose and Approach The Challenge We Face In our modern era, believers committed to biblical authority often find themselves caught between two unsatisfying extremes: either dismissing scientific discoveries as irrelevant to faith, or compromising clear biblical teachings to accommodate prevailing scientific consensus. Neither path honors both God's revelation in Scripture and His revelation through the natural world. What This Framework Attempts The Literal Programmatic Incursion (LPI) framework represents an honest attempt to address this tension...
Post a Comment
Read more

Search This Blog