Skip to main content

My Justification for Developing Designarism

As I delved deeper into the complexities of reality—its origins, its governing principles, and the apparent harmony between the natural world and human existence—I realized that many existing frameworks fell short of providing a cohesive explanation. Naturalism, for all its reliance on time, chance, and emergent complexity, failed to account for foundational truths like logic, mathematics, information, and intentionality. Theologically rigid interpretations sometimes struggled to harmonize with scientific observations. I felt compelled to address this gap, not by discarding faith or reason, but by uniting them into a holistic worldview.

Biblical Christian Designarism emerged from this pursuit. At its core, it is a Scripturally aligned, programmatic understanding of reality, grounded in the belief that an Ultimate Orchestrating Mind (UOM) governs every layer of existence. This hierarchy—from logic to mathematics, information, possibilities, probabilities, and physical reality—reveals a universe that is intentional, coherent, and deeply meaningful. Each layer depends on the previous, evidencing a Creator who designed reality with purpose and precision.

I introduced this framework because I saw a need for an interpretive model that does justice to both Scripture and science. The more I studied, the more apparent it became that these two "books" of revelation—God's Word and God's World—are not in conflict. Rather, they are complementary witnesses to His wisdom and glory. Designarism allows us to explore this harmony by acknowledging the immediacy of divine action alongside the procedural unfolding of creation’s systems.

This framework became especially vital as I grappled with questions about events like the creation week, the pre-Fall world, and the Flood. How could we account for the fossil record, radiometric evidence, or the apparent age of the cosmos without undermining the literal reading of Genesis? Designarism provided answers: by introducing multi-threaded processes, where geological time could be accelerated while biological time remained constant, I could reconcile these phenomena within a shorter biblical timeline.

I felt compelled to share this framework because it offers more than just intellectual satisfaction—it deepens our awe for God. It demonstrates that faith is not a retreat from reason but an invitation to engage with it fully. Designarism bridges the divide between theology and science, allowing us to embrace both the complexity of reality and the simplicity of its Creator’s intent.

Ultimately, I introduced this framework because I believe it reflects the truth of the world as God has made it: intentional, ordered, and designed for discovery. My hope is that Designarism inspires others to see the profound coherence of God’s creation and to approach both Scripture and science with renewed wonder and humility.

Comments

Post a Comment

Older Posts

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...
73 comments
Read more

Logic Force Theory: A New Perspective on Reality (R=L+S→D)

UPDATE:  I'm in the process of revising the core formula to obviate the tensor component , testing against readily available data and seeking collaborators. # Author's Note The theory presented in these pages emerged from a simple yet persistent question: Why does mathematics so effectively describe physical reality? This "unreasonable effectiveness," as Eugene Wigner famously termed it, suggests a deep connection between logical necessity and physical behavior. Logic Force Theory (LFT) represents an attempt to explore this connection by positing that logical structure might be more fundamental than physical laws themselves. I present this theory not as a complete or final framework, but as an invitation to consider a different perspective on quantum mechanics. While LFT offers potential solutions to longstanding problems like the measurement problem and the quantum-to-classical transition, it also raises new questions and challenges. Some of its mathematical framewor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...
71 comments
Read more