Skip to main content

Designarism’s Ultimate Orchestrating Hierarchy vs. Naturalism's Insufficient Hierarchy

The nature of reality and its origins are contested topics between Designarism’s Ultimate Orchestrating Hierarchy (UOH) and the Naturalism Hierarchy. Naturalism often claims simplicity, asserting that it explains reality with fewer assumptions. However, this claim is deceptive upon closer examination. The UOH, rooted in the Ultimate Orchestrating Mind (UOM), provides a more coherent and truly simple explanation for the structure of reality.

1. Defining the Frameworks

Ultimate Orchestrating Hierarchy (UOH) – Designarism

The UOH posits that reality is grounded in a single, necessary source: the Ultimate Orchestrating Mind (UOM). This mind is eternal, rational, and provides the foundation for all logical, mathematical, and physical structures. The UOH is a logically progressive framework in which each level builds coherently on the one above it.

Naturalism Hierarchy

The Naturalism Hierarchy assumes a self-contained universe originating in quantum fluctuations. It explains reality as the result of emergent phenomena, chance, and necessity.

2. Comparing Key Features

Aspect

Designarism Hierarchy 

Naturalism Hierarchy

Starting Point

Ultimate Orchestrating Mind (necessary, rational)

Quantum Fluctuations (unexplained brute fact)

Logic

Universal and intrinsic to the UOM

Emergent and contingent

Mathematics

Intrinsic, grounded in logic

Human abstraction of natural patterns

Information

Encoded purpose

Spontaneous organization

Fine-Tuning

Intentional design

Multiverse or chance

Causal Chain

Terminates in a necessary mind

Infinite regress or arbitrary termination

Emergence

Purposefully integrated

Placeholder for unexplained phenomena

3. Visualizing the Hierarchies

Designarism

Ultimate Orchestrating Mind (UOM)

 ↓

Logic (Universal and Immutable)

 ↓

Mathematics (Intrinsic to Reality)

 ↓

Information (Encoded Purpose)

 ↓

Possibilities (Defined by Intent)

 ↓

Probabilities (Purposeful Variability)

 ↓

Decoherence (Bridging Potentiality and Actuality)

 ↓

Classical Causality (Cause-and-Effect Relationships)

 ↓

Physical Reality (Observable Universe)


Naturalism

Quantum Fluctuations (Random Energy Fluctuations)

 ↓

Logical Principles (Contingent, Emergent Properties)

 ↓

Mathematics (Human Abstraction of Patterns)

 ↓

Information (Spontaneous Organization)

 ↓

Possibilities (Natural Potentials)

 ↓

Probabilities (Random Distributions)

 ↓

Decoherence (Emergence of Classical States)

 ↓

Classical Causality (Cause-and-Effect Relationships)

 ↓

Physical Reality (Observable Material Universe)


4. Conclusion

Naturalism’s claim to simplicity is unfounded. It relies on multiple brute facts, unexplained emergence, and extravagant hypotheses, making it fragmented and ontologically complex. In contrast, Designarism’s Ultimate Orchestrating Hierarchy (UOH) offers a truly simple and coherent framework by grounding all of reality in a single, necessary source—the Ultimate Orchestrating Mind (UOM). This eliminates contingency, resolves infinite regress, and provides a unified explanation for the structure of reality.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Why “Sky Daddy” Fails: Debunking a Lazy Insult Against God

Why “Sky Daddy” Fails: Debunking a Lazy Insult Against God Tags: #christianity #apologetics #faith #logic #theology There’s a term some atheists like to throw around—“sky daddy.” You’ve probably seen it in comment sections or memes, tossed like a grenade meant to shut down the conversation. It's not meant to spark discussion; it’s meant to ridicule. But here’s the thing: It’s not an argument. It’s a caricature. And like most caricatures, it reveals more about the one mocking than the one being mocked. 1. It’s Based on a Straw Man No serious Christian believes God is some bearded man living in the clouds. That’s a cartoon version. The actual Christian claim is far richer, deeper, and more philosophically grounded. Scripture describes God as: Eternal (Psalm 90:2) Spirit, not material (John 4:24) The sustainer of all things (Colossians...

Global Blasphemy Laws

One of the interesting things about discussions surrounding blasphemy laws (whether by the UN or others)is they cannot be conducted without coming back to the central question: What is Truth? Seems this was the question in Jesus' day, it's the question which comes us today, and it's a question which cannot be avoided. ... suppose God intended it to be this way?

Search This Blog