Skip to main content

Rules of Evidence and the Case for God

To evaluate the existence of God and to answer the skeptic's claim Christians have no evidence, a structured framework based on rules of evidence is essential. These principles ensure that claims are analyzed for their relevance, materiality, competence, admissibility, and reliability. Below, we apply these rules to present a comprehensive case for both the general existence of God and the specific existence of the Christian God through a variety of interrelated lines of evidence.


Rules of Evidence

  1. Relevance: Evidence must directly relate to the claim being evaluated.
  2. Materiality: Evidence must have a meaningful impact on the claim’s truth.
  3. Competence: Evidence must come from credible sources.
  4. Admissibility: Evidence must meet logical and empirical standards.
  5. Reliability: Evidence must be consistent and trustworthy.
  6. Privileges: Some foundational assumptions (e.g., logical laws) may serve as starting points.
  7. Presumptions and Burdens: The claimant bears the burden of proof.
  8. Exclusionary Rules: Evidence derived from unreliable or biased sources is excluded.
  9. Judicial Notice: Certain facts are widely accepted and require no further justification.
  10. Cumulative and Undue Delay: The case should include multiple, relevant lines of evidence without unnecessary complexity.

Lines of Evidence for the General Existence of God

1. Cosmological Argument: The Universe’s Existence and Beginning

  • Relevance: The existence of the universe requires explanation.
  • Materiality: If the universe has a cause, it implies a transcendent source.
  • Evidence:
    • The Kalam Cosmological Argument: Everything that begins to exist has a cause. The universe began to exist; therefore, it has a cause.
    • The Second Law of Thermodynamics: The universe’s usable energy is finite, indicating it cannot be eternal.
    • The Big Bang Theory: Scientific evidence points to a singular beginning, consistent with a transcendent cause.

2. Teleological Argument: Design and Fine-Tuning

  • Relevance: The universe’s fine-tuning for life is highly improbable under random chance.
  • Materiality: Fine-tuning suggests intentional design.
  • Evidence:
    • Physical constants (e.g., gravitational force, cosmological constant) fall within extraordinarily narrow ranges necessary for life.
    • Probability calculations demonstrate the inadequacy of chance or necessity as explanations.
    • The analogy of a functional machine or computer program reflects the universe’s complexity.

3. Moral Argument: Objective Morality

  • Relevance: Humans universally recognize moral values and duties.
  • Materiality: Objective morality implies a transcendent moral lawgiver.
  • Evidence:
    • Universal recognition of moral duties (e.g., prohibitions against murder).
    • The inadequacy of evolutionary or cultural relativism to explain objective moral truths.

4. Ontological Argument: Concept of a Necessary Being

  • Relevance: A maximally great being’s existence is logically coherent and necessary.
  • Materiality: The concept of a necessary being evidences God’s existence.
  • Evidence:
    • Logical necessity for a being that explains all contingent realities.

5. Argument from Consciousness

  • Relevance: Consciousness and subjective experiences defy naturalistic explanations.
  • Materiality: The existence of consciousness suggests an immaterial source.
  • Evidence:
    • The “hard problem of consciousness” challenges materialistic frameworks.
    • Consciousness aligns with the existence of an immaterial, personal Designer.

6. Argument from Contingency

  • Relevance: Contingent beings require a necessary being to explain their existence.
  • Materiality: A necessary being is the most plausible explanation for contingent reality.
  • Evidence:
    • The universe’s contingency implies dependence on a necessary, eternal, and independent being.

7. Logic, Mathematics, and Information

  • Relevance: Logic, math, and information are immaterial, universal, and foundational to understanding reality.
  • Materiality: Their existence and applicability imply a transcendent, rational, and purposeful source.
  • Evidence:
    • Logic: Immaterial, universal, and consistent, logic evidences an eternal mind.
    • Mathematics: The abstract nature of mathematical truths and the universe’s adherence to mathematical laws imply a rational Designer.
    • Information: DNA contains highly specified, functional information that implies an intelligent source.

Lines of Evidence for the Specific Existence of the Christian God

1. The Resurrection of Jesus

  • Relevance: The resurrection is the central claim of Christianity.
  • Materiality: If the resurrection occurred, it validates Jesus’ divinity and His claims about God.
  • Evidence:
    • Witness Testimony:
      • Over 500 eyewitnesses reportedly saw the risen Christ (1 Corinthians 15:3–7), including skeptics like James and Paul.
      • Multiple independent sources corroborate these testimonies, ensuring historical reliability.
    • Transformation of the Apostles:
      • The apostles’ dramatic shift from fearful deserters to bold evangelists—enduring persecution and martyrdom for no personal gain—strongly evidences their sincere belief in the resurrection.
    • Early Creedal Statements:
      • Creeds dated within a few years of the crucifixion (e.g., 1 Corinthians 15) demonstrate that the resurrection was proclaimed as fact early in Christian history.

2. Fulfillment of Prophecies

  • Relevance: Prophecies fulfilled by Jesus affirm divine foreknowledge.
  • Materiality: The fulfillment of specific prophecies corroborates Jesus’ role as the Messiah.
  • Evidence:
    • Messianic prophecies (e.g., Isaiah 53, Psalm 22) describe Jesus’ life, suffering, and death with remarkable specificity.
    • Statistical probability renders fulfillment by chance implausible.

3. Scriptural Coherence and Authority

  • Relevance: The Bible’s internal coherence across time, culture, and language as well as its transformative power evidence its divine origin.
  • Materiality: If divinely inspired, the Bible evidences the Christian God.
  • Evidence:
    • Unity across 66 books written by diverse authors in various cultures and three languages over 1,500 years.
    • Archaeological corroborations of cities, events, and practices described in Scripture.

4. Miracles

  • Relevance: Verified miracles point to God’s active involvement in the world.
  • Materiality: Miracles consistent with biblical descriptions evidence the Christian God.
  • Evidence:
    • Historical accounts of healings, provision, and other supernatural acts during Jesus’ ministry.
    • Modern-day claims of miracles within Christian contexts.

5. Witness Evidence

  • Relevance: Witness testimony provides direct evidence for the Christian claims, especially the resurrection.
  • Materiality: Multiple attested accounts and dramatic transformations corroborate key events of the Christian faith.
  • Evidence:
    • Many Witnesses: Eyewitnesses include over 500 individuals, skeptics, and enemies of the faith who became believers.
    • Apostolic Transformation: The apostles’ willingness to suffer and die for their testimony provides strong evidence for their sincerity and conviction.

6. Transformation of Culture and Lives

  • Relevance: Christianity’s impact on individuals and societies evidences its divine origin.
  • Materiality: The fruits of Christianity align with its claims of divine transformation.
  • Evidence:
    • Spread of Christianity through love and sacrifice rather than coercion.
    • Positive influence on art, science, morality, and governance.

7. Extra-Biblical Evidence

  • Relevance: Historical references outside of the Bible corroborate key events and figures in Christianity.
  • Materiality: Non-Christian sources strengthen the historical credibility of biblical claims.
  • Evidence:
    • Tacitus and Josephus: Roman and Jewish historians reference Jesus’ crucifixion, the existence of early Christians, and their rapid spread.
    • Pliny the Younger: Describes early Christian worship practices and their steadfastness under persecution.
    • Thallus and Suetonius: Mention events consistent with the biblical narrative, such as the darkness during Jesus’ crucifixion.
    • Archaeological Discoveries: Findings like the Pilate Stone and inscriptions confirming the existence of key biblical figures and places.

8. Unique Claims of Christianity

  • Relevance: Christianity makes claims that are distinct from all other religions and philosophies.
  • Materiality: These claims highlight Christianity’s unique nature and provide evidence for its divine origin.
  • Evidence:
    • Incarnation: Christianity uniquely asserts that God became man in the person of Jesus Christ (John 1:14).
    • Grace-Based Salvation: Unlike other religions, Christianity teaches that salvation is a free gift of grace, not earned by works (Ephesians 2:8-9).
    • Resurrection: No other religion claims the bodily resurrection of its central figure, providing both a historical and theological foundation.
    • Transformative Power: Christianity uniquely claims the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, which transforms believers’ lives (Galatians 5:22-23).
    • Love for Enemies: The radical ethic of loving and forgiving one’s enemies (Matthew 5:44) sets Christianity apart.

Conclusion

This analysis meets all the applicable Rules of Evidence by appropriately demonstrating:

Relevance: Each argument directly addresses the question of God's existence or the validity of Christianity.

Materiality: Every line of evidence contributes meaningfully to the case for a transcendent Designer and the specific claims of Christianity.

Competence: Sources include credible philosophical reasoning, historical testimony, and scientific insights.

Admissibility: Logical and empirical standards are upheld throughout the arguments.

Reliability: The evidence is consistent across fields and corroborated by independent sources (e.g., historical records, early creeds).

Privileges: Foundational assumptions such as logical laws are explicitly acknowledged and justified.

Presumptions and Burdens: The document meets the burden of proof for the claims, presenting robust and multidimensional arguments.

Exclusionary Rules: Speculative or unreliable evidence (e.g., unverified miracles) is excluded or qualified appropriately.

Judicial Notice: Universally recognized facts (e.g., the existence of moral intuitions, historical records of Jesus) are utilized effectively.

Cumulative and Undue Delay: Multiple lines of evidence are included, providing a comprehensive case without unnecessary repetition or complexity.

The cumulative evidence for the general existence of God and the specific existence of the Christian God is robust and multidimensional. Arguments from cosmology, design, morality, consciousness, and the immaterial nature of logic, math, and information build a compelling case for a transcendent, rational Designer. Witness evidence—particularly the many eyewitnesses of the resurrection and the transformation of the apostles—further substantiates the claims of Christianity. Extra-biblical evidence, including historical and archaeological references, strengthens the reliability of biblical accounts. Unique claims, such as the Incarnation, grace-based salvation, and the bodily resurrection of Jesus, set Christianity apart from all other belief systems. Together, these lines of evidence provide a rational and evidentiary foundation for belief in the God of the Bible.


Addendum: Objections and Responses

1. Objection: The Cosmological Argument Commits a Fallacy of Special Pleading

  • Response: The argument does not arbitrarily exempt God from causation. Instead, it posits that everything that begins to exist requires a cause. God, as a necessary being, is uncaused and eternal, fitting the definition of a necessary entity outside the scope of the universe’s contingent existence.

2. Objection: Fine-Tuning Can Be Explained by the Multiverse

  • Response: The multiverse hypothesis lacks empirical evidence and raises more questions than it answers. Even if a multiverse exists, the fine-tuning of the multiverse itself would require explanation, leading back to the need for a transcendent Designer.

3. Objection: Morality Can Be Explained by Evolution

  • Response: Evolution may explain certain social behaviors but fails to account for the objective nature of moral duties and values. Evolutionary explanations reduce morality to survival mechanisms, which cannot justify why actions are truly right or wrong beyond pragmatic utility.

4. Objection: The Resurrection Is Based on Myth or Legend

  • Response: The resurrection accounts are historically rooted and lack the characteristics of myth. They are based on early testimony, corroborated by multiple independent sources, and supported by the dramatic transformation of the apostles and early Christian growth under persecution.

5. Objection: Miracles Violate the Laws of Nature

  • Response: Miracles are not violations of natural laws but interventions by a transcendent being who governs those laws. Natural laws describe regular occurrences; they do not preclude the possibility of rare, divinely caused events.

6. Objection: Christianity Borrows from Pagan Myths

  • Response: Parallels between Christianity and pagan myths are superficial and lack historical basis. The accounts of Jesus are grounded in a Jewish context, and the resurrection claim is unique in its historical and theological implications.

7. Objection: Extra-Biblical Sources Are Biased or Insufficient

  • Response: While extra-biblical sources are limited, they corroborate key details of early Christianity and demonstrate the widespread impact of Jesus and His followers. Together with biblical accounts, they form a robust historical framework.

8. Objection: The Problem of Evil Contradicts a Good God

  • Response: Christianity provides a comprehensive answer to the problem of evil, emphasizing free will, the redemptive purpose of suffering, and the ultimate restoration of justice and goodness through God’s plan.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...

Global Blasphemy Laws

One of the interesting things about discussions surrounding blasphemy laws (whether by the UN or others)is they cannot be conducted without coming back to the central question: What is Truth? Seems this was the question in Jesus' day, it's the question which comes us today, and it's a question which cannot be avoided. ... suppose God intended it to be this way?

Search This Blog