Skip to main content

God's Overarching Framework: Conceptualization and Actualization

God's sovereign plan operates through a two-part framework of conceptualization and actualization, where He foreknows and predestines individuals based on their inherent dispositions toward or against communion with Him, ultimately working to glorify Christ both through the merciful salvation of the willing elect and the just condemnation of the necessarily rebellious reprobate.





Conceptualization (Foreknowledge, Election, and Predestination)


1. God's Foreknowledge: In the eternal mind of God, each person's nature is fully understood before creation itself. God doesn't look down a timeline but rather conceives of individuals within His eternal plan. He knows whether they are inherently willing for communion or inherently rebellious. This is relational knowledge, tied to their disposition. It's not contingent on human actions but rather God's full understanding of their nature.

• Scriptural Basis: Romans 8:29 - "For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son…"

• Explanation: Here, "foreknew" refers not to simple foresight but an intimate, determinate knowledge of the individual's nature. God knows what kind of person will freely align with His purposes, and this foreknowledge forms the foundation for His subsequent election.


2. Election: God, knowing each individual's inherent disposition (whether they are fit for communion or not), chooses those who are willing. It's important to emphasize here that this willingness is not merited by works—it is an inherent aspect of their nature. Though they are willing, they are still sinners marred by sin, and salvation is entirely an act of God's grace.

• Scriptural Basis: Ephesians 1:4-5 - "He chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ."

• Explanation: God's election is grounded in His loving purpose to bring some into communion. This is not based on human merit but rather on God's grace that brings the elect, who are inherently willing, into His family.


3. Predestination: God, having conceived the willing and unwilling, predestines the elect for salvation and communion. He arranges all the circumstances necessary for the willing to come to Christ and be sanctified. Predestination is an active part of the conceptualization—it's the unfolding of God's eternal plan where both the willing and unwilling play out their roles in alignment with their nature.

• Scriptural Basis: Romans 8:30 - "And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified."

• Explanation: This highlights the fact that the predestined elect are not simply left in their initial state but are led through the process of justification and sanctification, reflecting God's sovereign control over their ultimate salvation.


Actualization (The Unfolding in Time)


1. God's Plan Unfolds in Time: Actualization is the temporal unfolding of God's eternal conceptualization. For the elect, this means being drawn to God, their willingness made actual through the working of the Holy Spirit. For the reprobate, it is the playing out of their inherent rebellion—these individuals never repent, even when faced with divine truths.

• Scriptural Basis: Philippians 2:13 - "For it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure."

• Explanation: The willing are those in whom God works, both in terms of desire and action, reflecting the outworking of their election. Their inherent disposition for communion is made actual by the Holy Spirit's transformative power.


2. Final Judgment: At the end of time, the elect, who were foreknown, elected, and predestined, are glorified, sharing in God's glory as "little Christs." The reprobate, who have freely and necessarily rejected God according to their nature, are justly condemned. This is not a random or arbitrary process, but a direct consequence of their inherent nature.

• Scriptural Basis: Revelation 20:11-15 - The great white throne judgment, where those whose names are not in the Book of Life are judged according to their deeds and cast into the lake of fire.

• Explanation: The judgment is not merely punitive but a just outcome of their inherent and necessary rebellion, which God foreknew. It also serves to demonstrate the righteousness of Christ, with even the reprobate confessing His lordship.


God's Good Purpose in Christ's Glory


God the Father lovingly ordained that Christ would be glorified as Lord, Judge, and Savior over free beings made in His image. This is where the framework ties everything together:


• For the Elect: Christ is the Savior and Lord of those willing for communion. Through the work of the Holy Spirit, God actualizes the willingness of the elect, making them fit for eternal communion (Romans 8:17 - "…fellow heirs with Christ"). Their willingness is realized through the Holy Spirit's sanctification, bringing them into full conformity with Christ's image.

• For the Reprobate: Christ is the Lord and Judge over those who inherently and necessarily reject Him. They will eventually confess His justice, as even their logic, warped by rebellion, cannot deny His lordship (Philippians 2:10-11 - "Every knee shall bow… every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord"). This is the final actualization of their rejection, predetermined not by divine coercion but by their own inherent nature.


Integrated Objections and Responses


Objection 1: Doesn't election violate free will?

• Response: No, because God's election respects the inherent nature of individuals. God does not coerce the unwilling into rebellion, nor does He force the willing into communion. Instead, God foreknows each individual's disposition and actualizes their ultimate destiny according to their nature. This means that the willing come to Him freely, through the transforming power of the Spirit, and the unwilling reject Him freely, as their own rebellion dictates.


Objection 2: Isn't it unjust for God to condemn people who never had a chance to repent?

• Response: The reprobate are not condemned arbitrarily. Their rejection is inherent and necessary, based on their nature. God's justice is demonstrated not by giving them endless chances, but by allowing their inherent rebellion to run its course. Even at the final judgment, the reprobate will not repent; they will only acknowledge Christ's justice, compelled by their own logic.


Objection 3: Isn't it selfish for God to demand glory?

• Response: God's glory is not selfish because He shares it with the elect. Through their union with Christ, the elect are made "fellow heirs" and conformed to His image (Romans 8:29). This means that God's glory is not exclusive—He generously shares it with those He saves, magnifying His grace and love.


Tying It All Together: God's Good Purpose


God's ultimate purpose is to glorify His Son, Jesus Christ. Christ is glorified as both Savior and Judge. For the elect, Christ's saving work is made actual through the transforming power of the Spirit, leading to eternal communion with God. For the reprobate, Christ's justice is made evident through their condemnation, as they inherently and necessarily reject Him. This dual purpose—salvation and judgment—brings ultimate glory to God and magnifies the perfect justice and mercy of Christ as the Lord over all creation.


The balance of God's justice and mercy is perfectly preserved: those who are willing are mercifully drawn into eternal communion, and those who are unwilling are justly condemned to eternal separation, both outcomes demonstrating the righteousness and sovereignty of God.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...

Global Blasphemy Laws

One of the interesting things about discussions surrounding blasphemy laws (whether by the UN or others)is they cannot be conducted without coming back to the central question: What is Truth? Seems this was the question in Jesus' day, it's the question which comes us today, and it's a question which cannot be avoided. ... suppose God intended it to be this way?

Search This Blog