Skip to main content

The Erosion of Free Will: The Insidious Impact of Sin

When we consider the doctrine of free will in Christian theology, we often focus on its role in the original creation and the fall of humanity. However, it's crucial to examine how sin has fundamentally altered the nature of human free will since that pivotal moment in Eden. This article explores the profound ways in which sin has undermined our capacity for truly free choice.

In the beginning, God created humans with the ability to make uncoerced decisions, including the choice to love and obey Him. This freedom was exemplified in Adam and Eve's ability to choose between obedience and disobedience in the Garden of Eden. However, their decision to sin marked a turning point not just in human history, but in the very nature of human will.


Augustine's framework of the four states of man provides a helpful lens through which to view this transformation. Before the fall, humanity was in the state of "posse non peccare" (able not to sin). Following the fall, we entered the state of "non posse non peccare" (not able not to sin). This shift represents a fundamental corruption of human will.


Sin's impact on free will is multifaceted. Firstly, it has distorted our perception. Where once we could clearly see and understand God's goodness, sin has clouded our judgment. As Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 4:4, "The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ."


Secondly, sin has introduced competing desires into our nature. We find ourselves, as Paul describes in Romans 7:15, doing what we hate and failing to do what we want. This internal conflict undermines the clarity and power of our will.


Thirdly, sin has made us slaves to our baser impulses. Jesus himself said, "Very truly I tell you, everyone who sins is a slave to sin" (John 8:34). This bondage to sin severely limits our ability to freely choose the good.


Moreover, sin has corrupted not just individual wills, but entire systems and societies. We are born into a world where sinful patterns are deeply ingrained in cultures, institutions, and relationships. These external factors further constrain our choices.


The cumulative effect of these influences is that, while we still make choices, the freedom of those choices is significantly compromised. We are like addicts who technically "choose" to indulge our addiction, yet are driven by compulsions beyond our control.


However, the Christian narrative doesn't end with this bleak picture. Through Christ's redemptive work, believers enter Augustine's third state: "posse non peccare" (able not to sin). The Holy Spirit's regenerating work begins to restore our ability to choose rightly. As Paul writes in Galatians 5:1, "It is for freedom that Christ has set us free."


Yet even for the redeemed, the full restoration of free will remains a future hope. Only in the final state of glorification will we enter "non posse peccare" (not able to sin), where our wills will be perfectly aligned with God's, free from the corrupting influence of sin.


In conclusion, while God created humans with free will, sin has profoundly undermined this freedom. Our choices are now influenced by distorted perceptions, competing desires, and ingrained sinful patterns. Recognizing this reality should foster humility and dependence on God's grace. It also magnifies the power of Christ's redemptive work, which not only forgives sin but begins the process of restoring true freedom - the freedom to choose in alignment with God's perfect will.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...

Global Blasphemy Laws

One of the interesting things about discussions surrounding blasphemy laws (whether by the UN or others)is they cannot be conducted without coming back to the central question: What is Truth? Seems this was the question in Jesus' day, it's the question which comes us today, and it's a question which cannot be avoided. ... suppose God intended it to be this way?

Search This Blog