Sunday, August 17, 2008

Why not every scientist worships at Darwin's feet

Short but good Article by John Lennox showing how one's presuppositions affect how one views scientific evidence.

1 comment:

  1. Good point:

    "Indeed, the fact that there are brilliant scientists who believe in God and brilliant scientists who don't makes it clear that the conflict is not a simplistic one between science and religion, but between opposing world views - naturalism and theism. Naturalism opposes supernaturalism and insists that the natural world exists without incursion from outside, or as Carl Sagan put it: "The cosmos is all there is, or was, or ever shall be." The theistic view finds expression in the opening words of Genesis: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Theism understands the universe not to be a closed system, but a creation, initiated and maintained by God.

    The Genesis statement is a statement of belief, not a statement of science. This is precisely the case with Sagan's assertion as well. He is expressing a personal belief that emanates from a world view, rather than science."

    ReplyDelete

Nature theology

 Glory, power and beauty in the natural world is something even an atheist will acknowledge. Glory, power and beauty are attributes of the d...