I've just read "Unapologetic Apologist" and while I'd be interested in hearing the arguments from those who prefer a "less confrontational approach", from what the article says, it sounds like the apologetics being used have MANY POSITIVES to speak of:
1. It involves "active" apologetics.
(They are doing "something", & even "publicly".)
2. It involves "informed" apologetics.
(They display understanding of Islam & the superiority of Scripture)
3. It involves "engaging" apologetics.
(It speaks to an issue sure to gain attention)
4. It involves "gripping" apologetics.
(It's takes hold, and doesn't let responders off the hook easily)
5. It involves "resonating" apologetics.
(It's done in a way which will get people's attention.)
(It's done in a way which will hit home b/c of truth.)
6. It involves "pointed" apologetics.
(It points people to the Scripture.)
Those that are familiar with me know I am very staunchly against EP. It is definitely not because I am against Psalm singing. I love the Psa...
Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away ...
Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity....
WORLD: Another of the more controversial elements of the show was the choice to make the Jack/Jonathan character gay. Can you talk a little ...