Skip to main content

Mother Theresa's Letters (Part II)

Questions for Catholics concerning the beatification and canonisation of Mother Teresa:

1. Why is it that the Catholic church goes through such a laborious process to try to make one a saint, when the term saint (hagios = holy, set apart, sanctified, consecrated, etc.) is regularly bestowed upon all believers?

Does not Paul write "to all the saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi" (Philippians 1:1); "to all in Rome who are loved by God and called to be saints" (Rom 1:7); calling God's people to "be alert and always keep on praying for all the saints" (Eph 6:18); 1 Cor 14:33; Col 1:12; 2 Cor 13:13; Rom 15:25; Rom 8:27; Eph 3:18; etc.? Does not David in Psalm 30:4 say "Sing to the LORD, you saints of his; praise his holy name."? Do you think it might be that Catholic tradition by redefining sainthood as something other than Scripture defines it is leading to the problems it now is dealing with?


......
2. Where in the Bible do you find that it's necessary for one to perform a miracle (or two), or to be martyred, to become a saint?

3. Why is it that in all the years of the biblical record including the time of the prophets and the apostles you don't find the practice of beatification and canonisation? Why not... even among those who possess heavenly affirmation of their miracles, of their spiritual gifts, of their fruitful lives, of their exemplary service, of their martyrdom? Men and women such as Moses, Abraham, Elisha, Daniel, Stephen, Peter, Paul, John, etc.? While it's admitted that there's ecclesiastical growth and advancement that takes place in the church, if this issue was meant to be all that it's come to be today in the Catholic church, isn't it somewhat surprising that on such a "significant" issue, it did come about until its practice in the Catholic church?

4. While there's a place for remembering the Lord's servants and their service, where do you find in Scripture authority given to church leaders to determine what perfection, degree, or amount of virtue is needed to deem one worthy of public veneration (and to deny others of recognition)? The greater question is does not the current Catholic practice draw more attention to the individual than to the Lord, in whom, and through whom we have all things?

5. When it comes to mediators and intercession, would even intercession offered by the redeemed be acceptable apart from their acceptance in Christ?

While tradition can be a good thing, tradition itself needs to be examined in light of God's Word.

......

Comments

Older Posts

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...

Parallel Processing: Reconciling Creation and Time

The Curiosity rover, which landed on Mars in 2012, is equipped with two primary computers: the Rover Compute Element (RCE) and the Vision Compute Element (VCE). What's particularly interesting is how these two systems operate at different speeds within the same overall system. The RCE, which handles the rover's main functions, runs on a radiation-hardened RAD750 processor clocking at a modest 200 MHz. This might seem slow by Earth standards, but it's robust enough to withstand the harsh Martian environment. In contrast, the VCE, which processes image data for navigation, uses a significantly faster processor that can run at speeds up to 400 MHz. This allows for quicker processing of visual data, crucial for the rover's autonomous navigation. Here's where it gets fascinating: these two processors, running at different speeds, work together to control the rover's operations. From the perspective of the slower RCE, the VCE might process several complex image analys...