Skip to main content

Christ as Logos: A New Transcendental Argument

 

Introduction

“In the beginning was the Word (Logos), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” — John 1:1

For centuries, philosophers and theologians have sought to explain why reality is intelligible, ordered, and discoverable — and what ultimate foundation accounts for this remarkable structure.

Many traditional arguments for God’s existence appeal to contingency, design, morality, or causation. While these have their strengths, they often rely on probabilistic reasoning or features of the world that skeptics can contest as contingent or emergent.

This project takes a different path.




A New Approach: Starting with the Undeniable

Rather than beginning with what is contingent, I begin with what is inescapable: the universal logical constraint of reality.

Across every domain — physics, chemistry, biology, information — reality never violates the principles of logic. The laws of identity, non-contradiction, and excluded middle are not mere mental constructs; they structure reality itself.

This undeniable axiom serves as the foundation for a transcendental argument that proceeds step by step to its conclusion:
the Christian God, revealed in Christ as the Logos, is the necessary rational ground of reality.


The Argument in Brief

The work unfolds in six papers, each building on the previous:

1️⃣ The Universal Logical Constraint of Reality
Establishes that logical order is universal, necessary, and irreducible.

2️⃣ From Logic to Logos
Demonstrates that logical constraint requires a necessary rational cause — a personal mind.

3️⃣ From Logos to Design
Shows that because personal minds act intentionally, reality’s order is inherently designed.

4️⃣ Objections and Responses
Anticipates and answers major philosophical objections to the argument.

5️⃣ From Logos to Christ
Identifies four transcendental conditions (unity & diversity, causal interaction, epistemic accessibility, compatibility with disorder) that only the Christian God satisfies.

6️⃣ Literature Survey and Positioning
Situates this argument in the broader philosophical tradition and shows how it advances beyond classical arguments.


Why Does This Matter?

This argument does more than defend theism abstractly.
It demonstrates — with logical rigor — that the rational structure of reality points specifically to Christ as the Logos.
It’s not just that God is a plausible explanation.
It’s that without Him, the very possibility of rationality collapses.


Read the Full Work

I’ve made the full project available on GitHub, including all six papers in PDF format, a summary, and supporting materials.

πŸ“‚ Christ as Logos: A New Transcendental Argument — GitHub Repository


Join the Conversation

I welcome your feedback, questions, and critiques — either in the comments below or on GitHub.
Let’s think deeply together about the foundations of reason, reality, and faith.

Soli Deo Gloria.
— JD Longmire

r/LogicAndLogos

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

America: an Islamic Nation?

In President Obama's nobel acceptance speech, he made reference again to Islam as "a GREAT religion" (Caps, my emphasis, though it reflects the tone in which the statement was made). While I recognize both the political and practical benefits of using such a term (i.e., seeking to drive a wedge to separate the greater Muslim community from those presently and publicly endorsing jihad.... so as to avoid WWIII), at the same time I wonder if any News organization would consider counting and reporting the number of times the President of the United States has made reference to Islam as a Great Religion and the number of times he has publicly referred to Christianity as a Great Religion? I guarantee the difference would be ASTOUNDING! Question: Where's the CONSISTENCY when it comes to what many refer to today as "separation of church and state"? Seems while there may be "separation of Christianity and state", there is no "separation of Islam and...

Eckhart Tolle Christianity (Understanding Eckhart Tolle - Comparison / Difference with Christianity)

I believe it important that both believers and unbelievers understand the difference between the teaching of Eckhart Tolle and Christianity. Here's a brief post to introduce you to a few of the significant differences. (Note, I've just been exposed to Tolle, but it doesn't seem to take long to discern the differences) Context (the problem)Taken from here .: Despite Oprah and Eckhart's reduction of Christianity to but one "way" amongst many other equally legitimate ways to God, and their calling Christ a "revolutionary" who has been misunderstood by the Church, and who simply came to manifest "Christ-consciousness", a quick search through the internet reveals that many Christians are following Oprah in attempting to fuse together the teachings of Eckhart, and the doctrines of the historical Christian church. Great website to gain quick summary of Eckhart's beliefs/teachings: Ripples on the Surface of Being Key Responses by Eckhart To...

Search This Blog