Skip to main content

The Gospel of “Just”: Naturalism’s Shrinking Vocabulary and Growing Debt

There’s a gospel naturalism preaches, and it goes like this: “It’s just.”  

It’s just matter. Just energy. Just chance. Just neurons. Just evolution. Just language. Just logic. Just morality. Just you.  

But behind that tiny word—“just”—is a collapsing empire of miracles they refuse to name.


First, nothing explodes into everything—for no reason, from no cause. 


Miracle number one.  


Then, physical laws appear—fine-tuned to one part in 10^120. Gravity, electromagnetism, nuclear forces—all precisely balanced for life. 


Miracle number two.  


Then lifeless matter spontaneously organizes into coded, self-replicating, symbolically meaningful systems. DNA isn’t just molecules—it’s syntax, semantics, and execution. 


That’s miracle three.  


From there, blind evolution supposedly generates integrated biological systems with irreducible complexity and layered regulation. 


Miracle number four.  


Next, consciousness emerges—not just computation, but qualia, will, awareness. 


Miracle number five.  


Then logic and reason arise—immaterial, invariant, universally binding—from brains that evolved for survival, not truth. 


Miracle number six.


And at every step, when they hit the wall of explanation, they wave the wand and say the word: *emergence*.  


Consciousness? “It emerges.”  

Language? “It emerges.”  

Morality? “It emerges.”  

Symbolic logic in DNA? “Emergent properties.”  

Observer-triggered wavefunction collapse in QM? “Emergent from decoherence.”  


But “emergence” doesn’t mean anything if you can’t show the mechanism. It’s a label for magic in a worldview that forbids miracles. It’s saying, “This impossibly complex thing... just kind of showed up when enough stuff was around.” That’s not a theory. That’s a shrug in a lab coat.


And nowhere does this sleight of hand show more than in quantum mechanics.


In QM, particles don’t have defined properties until they’re observed. Probabilities rule. Measurement creates outcomes. Entangled particles communicate instantly across space. The system doesn’t “just behave”—it behaves *as if an observer matters.* And that wrecks the whole materialist model.


So they add layers: many worlds, hidden variables, decoherence theory—all trying to stuff the soul back in the machine. But the machine won’t cooperate.


Why? Because the universe doesn’t behave like a dead mechanism. It behaves like it’s being computed. Governed. Constrained by logic, drenched in information, awake to observation.


Naturalism can’t make sense of that. So it reduces, flattens, and spins.


You are not mind. You are meat.  

Morality is not obligation. It’s survival behavior.  

Consciousness isn’t special. It’s a trick.  

QM isn’t metaphysical. It’s misunderstood.  

Logic isn’t prescriptive. It’s adaptive.  


And when none of that works? “It just emerges.”


This is what happens when you try to explain a universe full of meaning, order, and mind without any foundation for meaning, order, or mind.


But Christians don’t need a magic word. We have a rational, personal, eternal source—*the Logos*.  


Not blind chance. Not spooky emergence. Not a roll of the quantum dice.  


A mind that speaks. A Word that upholds. A truth that explains everything else.


So the next time someone says, “It’s just…”—ask:  

What miracle did they just rename?  

What mystery did they just shrink with a buzzword?  

What rational leap are they asking you to make—without a rational foundation?


Then offer them a better way.  


The Gospel not of “just,” but of Jesus.  


The only Word that doesn’t collapse under the weight of meaning.


www.oddXian.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

America: an Islamic Nation?

In President Obama's nobel acceptance speech, he made reference again to Islam as "a GREAT religion" (Caps, my emphasis, though it reflects the tone in which the statement was made). While I recognize both the political and practical benefits of using such a term (i.e., seeking to drive a wedge to separate the greater Muslim community from those presently and publicly endorsing jihad.... so as to avoid WWIII), at the same time I wonder if any News organization would consider counting and reporting the number of times the President of the United States has made reference to Islam as a Great Religion and the number of times he has publicly referred to Christianity as a Great Religion? I guarantee the difference would be ASTOUNDING! Question: Where's the CONSISTENCY when it comes to what many refer to today as "separation of church and state"? Seems while there may be "separation of Christianity and state", there is no "separation of Islam and...

Inerrancy, Textual Criticism, and the Spirit’s Stewardship of Scripture: An Apologetic for the Reliability of God’s Word

  How Christians can confidently defend the Bible’s truth and transmission One of the most common objections skeptics raise is this: “How can you trust a book that’s been copied and recopied for thousands of years? Surely errors, omissions, and changes have crept in over time!” Christians who misunderstand how the Bible was preserved can themselves stumble — either doubting Scripture when confronted with textual variants, or clinging uncritically to one translation as though it alone were inspired. This article serves as an apologetic: to explain why Christians can trust the Bible, how inerrancy and textual criticism work together, and how the Holy Spirit has actively guarded God’s Word throughout history. Inerrancy: God’s Perfect Word Christians affirm that the Scriptures, in their original autographs , were fully inspired by God and perfectly true. “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching…” (2 Timothy 3:16). This doctrine applies specifically to what the...

A Novel Reinterpretation of Origins: Literal Programmatic Intervention

Literal Programmatic Intervention A Systems Approach to Biblical Creation "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made."  - John 1:1,3 A Note on Purpose and Approach The Challenge We Face In our modern era, believers committed to biblical authority often find themselves caught between two unsatisfying extremes: either dismissing scientific discoveries as irrelevant to faith, or compromising clear biblical teachings to accommodate prevailing scientific consensus. Neither path honors both God's revelation in Scripture and His revelation through the natural world. What This Framework Attempts The Literal Programmatic Intervention (LPI) framework represents an honest attempt to address this tension. It seeks to: Take Scripture seriously  as historical narrative while engaging substantively with scientific observations Challenge modern objections  to bib...

Search This Blog