Skip to main content

Evaluating my approach

There are a lot more “quiet Christians” out there trying to live out Jesus’ character and love their neighbors than the microcosm of fringe weirdos, mega-“pastors”, and “Christian” politicians you see in public forums, like on X, Facebook, TikTok, or Reddit. Sadly, the fringe are the ones most likely to get attention.



The truth is, most humans thrive on drama and outrage, because it gives them a sense of purpose and meaning. People love a “cause” and to feel and express “righteous anger”.

I will confess, I have been guilty of initiating or promoting outrage and drama, myself. In fact, the process of typing out this message caused me to reexamine my own approach.

For reasons above, it’s probably too much to hope that the tone in public forums would be more civil, just like it’s too much to hope that Christians would be more civil, too.

Christ reserved His strongest criticism and true righteous anger for internal issues and showed love, concern, and respect for everyone else. We’d do well to adopt the same approach.

Examining, and even resisting, ideas through respectful (and even passionate) debate is a worthy goal, and it should always be done in a tone and manner that acknowledges the value of the person.

This topic originated elsewhere and I thanked the poster for the opportunity for introspection and, hopefully, growth. I’ll try and be more careful and charitable in the future.

Proverbs 15:1 A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eckhart Tolle - Christian Response

Unbelievable! ...The extent man not founded upon Christ will go and follow in their quest and pursuit of self and attempts to explain away reality and sin. Here's Oprah's spiritual sage... Response: 1. He resurrects errors of the past which deny reality by seeking to replace it with forms. 2. By reducing the past to forms (or photo albums) he not only denies the reality of the past but the extent of it's connectedness and relationship to the present. This error he also translates in regard to the future. 3. He establishes a false premise that one can separate the reality of the present ("now") from reality itself, which he vests in onesself (though he inconsistently goes on to suggest that life is found in abandoning oneself) 4. He has no grounds or basis for assuming reality is found in self (and apart from everything else, or only what one want's to allow) 5. By denying the truth of God, he falsely asserts that the future is no longer problematic...

Why “Sky Daddy” Fails: Debunking a Lazy Insult Against God

Why “Sky Daddy” Fails: Debunking a Lazy Insult Against God Tags: #christianity #apologetics #faith #logic #theology There’s a term some atheists like to throw around—“sky daddy.” You’ve probably seen it in comment sections or memes, tossed like a grenade meant to shut down the conversation. It's not meant to spark discussion; it’s meant to ridicule. But here’s the thing: It’s not an argument. It’s a caricature. And like most caricatures, it reveals more about the one mocking than the one being mocked. 1. It’s Based on a Straw Man No serious Christian believes God is some bearded man living in the clouds. That’s a cartoon version. The actual Christian claim is far richer, deeper, and more philosophically grounded. Scripture describes God as: Eternal (Psalm 90:2) Spirit, not material (John 4:24) The sustainer of all things (Colossians...

Global Blasphemy Laws

One of the interesting things about discussions surrounding blasphemy laws (whether by the UN or others)is they cannot be conducted without coming back to the central question: What is Truth? Seems this was the question in Jesus' day, it's the question which comes us today, and it's a question which cannot be avoided. ... suppose God intended it to be this way?

Search This Blog