In Fashion Designer Karl Lagerfeld Defends Fur: Kill 'Beasts' Before They Kill Us we see two different views (one to kill animals, one not to kill animals)that shows the arbitrary and ultimately foundationless positions of those who have no ultimate standard.
It's interesting that the comment by PETA is to describe His views as "outdated" but without any basis for showing older or former views are wrong. On the other hand, he argues the inconsistency of views which address one area while doing the opposite in other areas. I may be wrong, but it seems given his position, the greater issue for him may probably be driven by neither the rightness or wrongness of killing animals, but the financial issues related to it.
Praise God that he has not only given an ultimate standard to guide us but also wisdom which show the issue more involved than just kill or not kill, but involves matters such as use, stewardship, etc.
......
Type rest of the post here
......
It's interesting that the comment by PETA is to describe His views as "outdated" but without any basis for showing older or former views are wrong. On the other hand, he argues the inconsistency of views which address one area while doing the opposite in other areas. I may be wrong, but it seems given his position, the greater issue for him may probably be driven by neither the rightness or wrongness of killing animals, but the financial issues related to it.
Praise God that he has not only given an ultimate standard to guide us but also wisdom which show the issue more involved than just kill or not kill, but involves matters such as use, stewardship, etc.
......
Type rest of the post here
......
Comments
Post a Comment