Twisting Scripture: How “Toxic Empathy” Has Led to the Distortion of Biblical Truth and the Splintering of Christian Churches
Introduction
Empathy is not the enemy of truth. But when empathy becomes the arbiter of truth, it mutates into something deadly. Scripture calls believers to compassion rooted in holiness, not sentiment detached from righteousness.
What many now call toxic empathy, the insistence that love means unconditional affirmation, has become one of the most destructive theological errors within modern Christianity.
It appeals to the emotions while silencing the conscience. It exchanges conviction for comfort and holiness for harmony. And nowhere is this clearer than in the way certain churches twist Scripture to affirm what God condemns.
⸻
1. The False Gospel of Affirmation
In the name of empathy, entire denominations have recast sin as identity. The LGBTQ+ movement, once addressed by the church as a mission field, has been redefined as a ministry category within it.
What began as a call to love the sinner has devolved into a demand to legitimize the sin.
Toxic empathy reframes the gospel as emotional validation.
“Love your neighbor” becomes “Approve your neighbor.”
“Judge not” becomes “Discern nothing.”
“God is love” becomes “Love is god.”
This inversion elevates human emotion over divine revelation, treating Scripture as a mirror for cultural sentiment rather than a lamp for moral clarity.
⸻
2. Scripture Twisting in the Service of Sentiment
Used to claim that God’s primary characteristic is emotional tolerance. Yet the same passage defines love through obedience: “This is love for God: to keep His commands”. Love without moral boundaries is not divine; it is idolatrous affection. God’s love redeems the sinner; it never redefines sin.
“Judge not, lest ye be judged” (Matthew 7:1)
A favorite shield of moral relativism. Jesus continues, “First take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” The passage commands humility in judgment, not the abdication of discernment. Toxic empathy weaponizes this verse to silence moral accountability.
“There is neither male nor female” (Galatians 3:28)
Progressive theologians twist this to erase gender distinction. Paul’s context, however, concerns spiritual equality in salvation, not the dismantling of God’s created order. Male and female remain distinct expressions of the divine image (Genesis 1:27) . Equality before God does not dissolve the boundaries He designed.
“David and Jonathan’s love” (1 Samuel 18:1)
Some revisionists claim this friendship was romantic. Yet the text uses covenantal language identical to kinship and military loyalty, not erotic affection. Reading homosexuality into the text is a classic case of eisegesis, imposing modern ideology onto ancient Scripture.
“Jesus never condemned homosexuality”
This is argument from silence. Christ affirmed the Genesis model of marriage, “male and female” joined as “one flesh”, explicitly grounding sexual ethics in creation. He did not need to name every sin; He reaffirmed the standard. Silence in Scripture never equals permission.
⸻
3. Deconstructing the Original Languages
A growing trend fueled by toxic empathy is the attempt to reinterpret the original Hebrew and Greek to align Scripture with modern identity frameworks. Rather than submitting to the text, interpreters reshape it under the pretense of “linguistic correction.”
This is empathy weaponized through scholarship.
Terms like arsenokoitai (1 Corinthians 6:9) and malakoi are claimed to mean only “abusive relationships” or “exploitation,” despite consistent lexical evidence that they condemn all sexual relations between men.
The Hebrew term toʿebah (Leviticus 18:22) is reframed as a mere “cultural taboo,” stripped of its moral weight.
This linguistic revisionism is often justified as empathy for the marginalized, but in practice, it subordinates revelation to emotion. By reengineering language to fit contemporary narratives, the modern interpreter becomes the authority instead of the Author.
Scripture is no longer exegeted; it is edited.
Once meaning becomes negotiable, authority collapses. The same method used to sanitize sexual sin can easily be applied to any moral command that offends modern sensibilities.
⸻
4. From Compassion to Compromise
Toxic empathy tells believers that disagreeing with someone’s identity means hating them. But Scripture distinguishes between love that redeems and love that deceives.
“Faithful are the wounds of a friend, but deceitful are the kisses of an enemy”.
The false church prefers kisses, gentle words that anesthetize the soul while it drifts from God.
Empathy without truth sanctifies the flesh and silences the Spirit. When pastors reinterpret God’s commands to avoid offending feelings, they cease to be shepherds and become therapists. Emotional safety replaces moral sanctification. Christ’s call to “deny yourself” is rebranded as “affirm yourself.”
⸻
5. The Emotional Captivity of the Church
Many congregations now build theology around cultural trauma rather than divine truth. Sin is re-explained as oppression, repentance as self-acceptance, and grace as the right to remain unchanged. Sermons are curated to avoid “triggering” listeners instead of convicting them.
Romans 1 warns that when truth is suppressed for emotional comfort, judgment follows: “God gave them over to a depraved mind.” Yet many pulpits reinterpret this passage as a commentary on ancient exploitation rather than a condemnation of all same-sex acts.
The result is predictable: doctrinal clarity evaporates, church discipline vanishes, and holiness becomes optional.
Emotional resonance replaces repentance. The church ceases to confront the world and begins to imitate it.
⸻
6. The Consequences of Empathy Untethered
Moral confusion – When the Bible becomes pliable to emotion, objective categories of sin and righteousness collapse.
Doctrinal fragmentation – Churches divide along emotional loyalties rather than theological conviction.
Loss of witness – A church that echoes culture cannot confront it.
Spiritual decay – Empathy replaces repentance, and grace degenerates into permissiveness.
Isaiah 5:20 warns, “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil.” Toxic empathy has done precisely this, rebranding rebellion as authenticity and holiness as hate.
⸻
7. Redeeming Empathy through Holiness
The answer is not apathy but alignment. Christ calls His followers to compassion governed by truth. The same Savior who dined with sinners also told them, “Sin no more.”
True empathy enters pain but never excuses its cause.
It sees the sinner’s wound not as something to be celebrated but to be healed by repentance and grace.
Ephesians 4:15 remains the model: “Speak the truth in love.”
Truth without love is brutality. Love without truth is betrayal.
Holy empathy, Christlike empathy, does both: it weeps over sin while calling the sinner home.
⸻
Conclusion
Toxic empathy is not compassion; it is capitulation. It dresses rebellion in the garments of virtue and demands that the church bless what God forbids.
When empathy is severed from holiness, it becomes a counterfeit gospel, one that trades repentance for affirmation and salvation for self-expression.
The remedy is a return to biblical order: truth in love, not love undermining truth.
Compassion must be framed in Christ, and the church must remember that love without holiness is not love at all.
Christ did not die to affirm who we are. He died to transform who we are.
Anything less is not empathy; it is enmity with God.