Sunday, February 27, 2022

Exclusive Psalmody and the Name of Jesus

Exclusive Psalmody (EP) is a doctrine that has been adopted by some historically reformed churches. In brief, EP adherents claim that the 150 Psalms of the Old Testament (OT) are the only Biblically warranted songs allowed in worship. This supposedly aligns with the reformed Regulative Principle of Worship (RPW) that is summarized as "if commanded, required - if not commanded, prohibited".

The EP adherent claims that because there is (arguably) nowhere in the New Testament (NT)/New Covenant (NC) commanding the composition of new songs for use in worship, then songs that are written outside of the Bible (so called "uninspired" songs) are prohibited, thus only the inspired songs of the Psalms are proper and allowed in worship.

In contrast, Inclusive Psalmody (IP) acknowledges that while the Psalms are an incredible resource for sung worship, the church is also edified by the use of newly composed hymns and other spiritual songs, much in the same manner as newly composed prayers and sermons. (With the obvious acknowledgement that not everything newly composed is edifying and should be subject to the 1 Thessalonians 5:21 rule with Scripture as the prime source of evaluation.)

There are many arguments for and against EP, but I believe the strongest EP counterargument is the fact that EP implicitly prohibits the NT revealed name of Jesus in sung worship.

The EP position is that the word yeshua/ישוע is used many times in the Psalms and it is the root source of the name of Jesus. That is 100% accurate. However, they go on to assert that this satisfies any requirement concerning the use of Jesus' name in sung worship. The complication arises when the context of the word in the Psalms is considered. It is always used to speak of salvation, not the name of the One who is the revealed source and author of salvation, namely Jesus. EP uses theological/linguistic gymnastics to support a false conclusion.

The OT, including the Psalms, only speak of Jesus in "types and shadows", not directly using His revealed NT name. To rightfully sing of Jesus as Lord and Savior, one must sing incorporating the proper name of Jesus (i.e., Joshua, Yeshua, Ἰησοῦς, ישוע) to refer to the revealed Jesus, which the Psalms do not do.

This is not to imply that the Psalms are not to be used, or that Jesus' name be inserted into every element of worship constantly. It is to point out, again, that EP, by its very nature, never allows the revealed proper name of Jesus in sung worship.

I have compiled some references and uses of our Lord and Savior's revealed proper name to illustrate how EP is an erroneous doctrine. Keep in mind, this is in no way an exhaustive study concerning the name of Jesus, just some powerful examples (all from ESV - emphasis mine).

Our Lord refers to benefits of His revealed name: 

John 14:13 - "Whatever you ask in my name, this I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son."

Matthew 18:20 - "For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them."

At Saul/Paul's conversion, the Lord announces Himself by His revealed name:

Acts 9:4-5 - And falling to the ground, he heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?" And he said, "Who are you, Lord?" And he said, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.

The NT authors held the revealed name of Jesus in very high regard and its use as integral to the proper practice and worship of the church.

Acts 4:11–12

This Jesus is the stone that was rejected by you, the builders, which has become the cornerstone. And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”

Philippians 2:9–11

Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Colossians 3:17

And whatever you do, in word or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him.

2 Thessalonians 1:12

so that the name of our Lord Jesus may be glorified in you, and you in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ.

1 John 3:23

And this is his commandment, that we believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another, just as he has commanded us.

Jesus' name is so vital it will be inscribed on believers' foreheads as we worship Him at the end times and in eternity:

Revelation 22:3-4

No longer will there be anything accursed, but the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and his servants will worship him. They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads.

If it will be on our heads then, it certainly should be on our lips as we sing in worship now!

Finally, Jesus authorizes John's vision by His name:

Revelation 22:16 ESV - 16 "I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify to you about these things for the churches. I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star."

Ultimately, the Psalms themselves command that we sing of the deeds of the Lord (Psalms 9:1, 11, 107:22) . How can this happen if we don't sing about the deeds of Jesus as recorded in the New Testament?

The Scriptural evidence is clear. Jesus' revealed NT/NC name should be used in every component of worship. This fact overrides every other EP argument and effectively invalidates the EP position.

To be clear, I love the Psalms and certainly believe they allude to Jesus and are rightfully to be sung in worship. It is the exclusivity of Psalms as sung worship that is the focus of concern.

Due to the overwhelming Scriptural evidence and support, it is reasonable to conclude that EP doctrine, its adherents, and teachers are in error. It is my prayer that anyone practicing, teaching, or considering EP repent and align themselves to the truth of Scripture over the fallacies of this man-made doctrine.

Semper reformanda! 

P.S.
Gary Crampton has a very good article outlining why EP is a flawed doctrine, here.
For additional information on the EP error, see Sam Waldron's essays here.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Why I am vehemently against Exclusive Psalmody (EP)

Those that are familiar with me know I am very staunchly against EP. It is definitely not because I am against Psalm singing. I love the Psa...